LO-SCORE TABLE (aka Bottom 20)

[matlu]

I was asked to list players with lowest score. Here they are (sorry for bad formatting)

Code Select Expand


monkey123 2
Zwivix 2
Bear86 4
kingo 4
scotty05        6
ska_monkey 8
dragon75            8
CoKe_Can        8
Lowgravity       14
TheArbiter      16
tydude187        22
md848 22
Spike 23
Raikoukami 28
uminum 28
sumeet 28
ultrasabree1 30
Camus 32
battlemech2 34
8ball 34


[Konig_Wolf]

Forgetting that they may win some, there is at least 1647 points in all; lost by them, gained by . . . whom . . .?

Plus the other accounts that have scores in the 40-100 range there is a significant amount of points floating around . .

How many accounts have been created to-date ?

(I noticed 2 of the lowest scores are the same person).

[ultswordsman]

yea man that would be me when id get in the 2os or so id  get a new account and i have around 3 -5 but im doing good now so no worrys

[BladeSabre]

I need to play some more - maybe I'll get on that list =P

[zzboots]

Forgetting that they may win some, there is at least 1647 points in all; lost by them, gained by . . . whom . . .?

Plus the other accounts that have scores in the 40-100 range there is a significant amount of points floating around . .

High Score List total: 10902 points
Average Score per high scorer: 545.1
^^^Thats who gained the points ^^^

Bored, so I calculated that out in case anyone was wondering.  I know how much everybody loves math.

But I agree, Konig, that the 40-100s are picking up the slack.

[Konig_Wolf]

Hello.               

                10902
              -  1647   
                 9255

Not withstanding the "losses/wins possibilities" and forget the guests who take and give points;

pretend everyone with a point score between 40-100 has 60 points (just a example).

40 points lost from that group - and gained by others. Now, (not including guests)

                        231.375   <--- People needed for approximate points in the total high score list
                 40) 9255

That is a lot of people playing . . . How many accounts have been created?


Wait. I almost forgot all the people below the top 20 list, there must be say 10-30 more users with somewhere under the lowest high score list, say 180-240 points



In summation, Where the Shisno (RvB reference) are all these points coming from?

[zzboots]

In summation, Where the Shisno (RvB reference) are all these points coming from?

All the hard working, honest duelboard players.  Why?  Is there a problem? 

[zzboots]

I would love to hear other people's thoughs on this post, if anyone is willing to share.

[BladeSabre]

There's not much we can conclude without seeing the entire score-table with however many hundred people on it.

[Bear]

ok u guys..i hate to burst your lil learning math bubble.. but your forgetting about the points that are given out by players who are at lvl 2... they stay at lvl 2 and u go up.. theres also guests... they give out points.. but there points resest everytime they enter..

[zzboots]

ok u guys..i hate to burst your lil learning math bubble.. but your forgetting about the points that are given out by players who are at lvl 2... they stay at lvl 2 and u go up.. theres also guests... they give out points.. but there points resest everytime they enter..

Guests have the POTENTIAL to both add points and take points out of the system.  If a guest wins a match, that's less points.    Again, the purpose of a guest name is to try the game.  A few games is enough to determine whether or not a person likes the game.  But I know of several players who play as guests and win.

And a player at 2 points still can win games.  They still shouldn't be loosing vast amounts of points.  Let's say a level two player wins 10% of the time.  In 100 one on one games, that's 160 points lost.  So, are you telling me that the bottom players are loosing hundreds of games?

Fact is duelboard doesn't have the ammount of active players to support all the points.  The system isn't designed so everybody wins, yet that's the way things seem to be.

[Bakster]

It's obvious, people are multi-naming.

Look at the Top 10, the majority of them have "disappeared". I know for a fact that skin and kaoss are one and the same.

And suddenly people like Waylan and Reg50 come along and zoom up the charts like wildfire. I have a feeling that Waylan and Reg50 have more than one name.

[Fleur De Chanson]

i dunno about reg but waylans not cheating... and whats more then 1 name have to do with it u cant give yourself pts can u? anyways waylan is just a good player... he was on top list on the old cyber wars too..

[waylan]

Bakster you ARE an idiot. i had about 3000 points on gamesdomain aswell and im good and i play a lot.. thats why im moving up the table fast. Just because it doesnt take me 700 games and 3 months to do it like you ive GOT to be cheating. Well done for wasting more of your time than me and still having less points 

[The_Gu3st]

People who play for points are pathetic one way or another. I know that sounds ironic coming from me, but just because I dont play for points doesnt mean I dont win.