Disruptor & Disintegrator

[flamingdragon]

I think mind control needs to have better probability of working.

It has failed the last 20 times i have used it. 

[SiR gUt]

RESISTANCE!! thats what, hypno, virus, disten, disrupt, electro are all based on so lets just leave it that way.

[TheMcCool]

Yeah, Resistance was for electropulse, virus, disrupter, disentegrator, and mind control. Electropulse and Virus weren't actually 100%, just very very hard to resist.

In the original cyberwars, disintegrator did have a good chance(maybe 50%?) of killing mechs, spiders, etc, and fully upgraded commanders too. Disrupter was weaker, but still had a good chance of killing a non upgraded commander or a slime beast or a mining droid or something.

They were not too strong. They added strategy to the game. Good players always sent out weak creatures in front, to block for the good creatures. And various other tactics come into play. Dunno if this is already implemented, but the disrupter and disintegrator did have ranges, and had to be aimed by the commander. Disintegrater was range 4 and disrupter was range 6 I believe. So that gives stuff like force fields and beacons more use, for blocking.

[zozefup]

Sorry,  my post sucked so I deleted it.  What I meant was one person said something like "It would suck to beam a good monster only to have it disintegrated."  Thats why I ask if as a whole, are we wanting it stronger or weaker.  I think It should be stronger, but I didn't want it so strong that it would have a 90% chance to kill a commander.

I think a commanders resistance should be raised, and Disruptor & Disintegrator's strength should be raised.

[zzboots]

Sorry,  my post sucked so I deleted it.  What I meant was one person said something like "It would suck to beam a good monster only to have it disintegrated."  Thats why I ask if as a whole, are we wanting it stronger or weaker.  I think It should be stronger, but I didn't want it so strong that it would have a 90% chance to kill a commander.

I think a commanders resistance should be raised, and Disruptor & Disintegrator's strength should be raised.

Commander's resistance is already 7, isn't it? That's relatively high.

[cDigital]

After evaluating the +20% res bonus I still find that they tend to be somewhat ineffective percentage wise. 

[matlu]

After evaluating the +20% res bonus I still find that they tend to be somewhat ineffective percentage wise. 

Depends on what do you target. I can imagine that it is still very inefective on "heavy" monsters, because thay have either very big resistance, or defence. Both matters. Don't know, maybe I could increase resistance "bonus" (or "handicap" if you wish to call it this way), ok maybe increase strength of these attacks (which is currently 4 and 7)

[anima]

Don't know, maybe I could increase resistance "bonus" (or "handicap" if you wish to call it this way), ok maybe increase strength of these attacks (which is currently 4 and 7)

I think this is a good idea. Disintergrator has to be a feared action in cyber battles. Its the only real hope you can have when faced with a mech or queen (especially when you have little else). I think the chance of destroying queen and mech should be at least 50%.

[Dodger]

But if it has 50% chance of killing a mech or queen, that makes it way to easy to kill a commander with it.

[The_Gu3st]

Hmm matlu, can you tell me the exact strengths of both Disintegrator and Disrupter?

[The_Gu3st]

*Bump

[Dodger]

ok maybe increase strength of these attacks (which is currently 4 and 7)

[The_Gu3st]

That's why I was confused. He said that maybe he would increase it and I don't know if he did or not.

Could you clarify for us what the current strengths of disrupter and disintegrator are now, Matlu?

[The_Gu3st]

*bump, again.

Can you please answer my question matlu?

[Blitz]

PM him!